Phil Katz on Steve
Sinnott
Phil is responsible for the membership
communications work of the
Phil wrote a tribute to Steve for the Marx Memorial Library – a dynamic institution of the working class movement that they both held in great esteem… and, with Phil’s permission, I’ve reprinted it here.
A tribute to Steve Sinnott 1951 - 2008
When
Steve died on Saturday 5 April 2008 the working class lost, quite simply, one
of its finest. Unusually for a death in the family of organised
labour, Steve made prime time media and, amazingly,
broke the barrier which BBC News places round most things to do with workers
unless, of course, it involves knife crime.
Even
the opponents of organized labour knew that his
passing was significant.
The
response to the loss has been unprecedented in a generation. Workers had lost a
thinker and a strategist. From the Prime Minister to supply teachers, from
There
was something different about Steve and he knew it. But he saw himself not as
an exception but as a general secretary of a new type. This, because he knew
unions were changing and the old ways would no longer do. Steve died just when
his thinking and his strategy were making an impact within the TUC.
Steve
was fascinated by knowledge – what it was – how it had developed historically
and was shared across the globe, how it was acquired and how it was passed on
between generations. He recognized intelligence in everyone and thought all had
a role to play, somehow, somewhere. He was truly a teacher. He must have been
the only general secretary in recent years whose election campaign included an
undertaking to retire at the end of his second term so he could go back to the
tools. Steve loved books – a word he relished applying his Liverpudlian
accent too.
One
of the things Steve was working on when he died was the outline of a speech he
asked to give as part of the Monday evening lecture season at Marx Library –
http://www.marx-memorial-library.org
His
chosen subject was ‘Education and Religion’. He delayed giving it once so that
he would not be seen to influence the NUT Working Party on
Our
modern understanding of what constitutes a general secretary is a largely
Victorian creation, when unions were still in formation and relatively small.
General Secretary's then were self sacrificing, cultured and vigorous and very
close to shop floor - read the memoirs of Tillett or
Thorne, Joseph Arch or Mary Macarthur, Gertrude Tuckwell
or Tom Mann. The office of general secretary today retains echoes of this past,
but the organisations they lead are quite different.
The modern union has annual income in the tens of millions with hundreds of
thousands of members, officers and offices, hundreds of staff, training
colleges and auditors. They have influence in workplace and right up to
Ministry and Cabinet - as well as a national campaigning role. Few have had as
much impact as the NUT in recent years. Steve was about to lead the first
national teachers’ strike in 21 years on April 24.
Steve
was a modern general secretary replete with a degree in economics - on top of
his brief - able to deal with complex budgets or appearances in front of
parliamentary commissions, key note speeches at international conferences, or
his very favourite, an hour spent in a school
wherever, and a chance to sit with teachers and share ideas, or just natter. Ordinary teachers dominate the book of condolence
at teachers.org.uk. Many include a tale of one of his visits. He had personal
qualities, which are in nature's gift and qualities developed through training
and experience, gained through a life of relentless struggle. He was an
archetypical product of his comprehensive education, the first with such an
education to be NUT president, then deputy general secretary, and then general
secretary.
The
NUT, now 138 years old, spans three centuries and Steve was immersed in its
history. He was energised by it and often came up
with solutions to current day problems, which had strong legacies of the past.
I recall I once tried to persuade him not to call his outline plan for a new
democratic structure for school governance 'a school board' with all the echoes
of Lansbury, Burns and Annie Besant.
One
of the reasons he was such a strong supporter of MML was his love of
literature. He felt guilty reading a book by Frank McCourt or William Morris –
News From Nowhere was a favourite
- or a biography of Atlee or Michael Foot, one of his favourite
characters, or Tony Benn, when he thought he should be genning
up on the next piece of education legislation. But he read all the time and
many a colleague’s eye would glaze over as Steve and I swopped
anecdotes about characters we were then reading about. Scheer’s biography
of Tillett was the last one we swopped.
Steve
read as broadly as one could imagine and had a significant collection of labour movement and African Liberation Movement literature.
His favourite was biography. We often bought each
other books. I found him a copy of Nkrumah’s memoirs, a biography of Jack Jones
and a 1st edition of Orwell’s Road to Wigan Pier. In
return I received a biography of Sylvia Pankhurst and
the Chief Rabbi’s To Heal a Fractured World – The Ethics of Responsibility. I
had some of Steve’s speeches – for example, the Gaitskell memorial speech - an
important contribution to working class internationalism - bound for him at the
famous Wyvern Bindery – but avoided covering them in pigskin as he was a
vegetarian! Green was his chosen colour.
It
tickled him to stand at the Marx lIbrary in the same
rooms frequented by Lenin or Quelch or Morris when it
had been home to the famous Twentieth Century Press. He was always urging me to
raise the possibility of reestablishing a Workers'
Steve
was convinced that the movement suffered by doing too little to pass on its
history of thought and achievement. After all, history governed the boundaries
within which we conduct ourselves in the present. Appreciation of it also helps
us imagine futures. He put serious money into the NUT support for the TUC
festival at Tolpuddle, he spoke at the Burston School
Strike rally. He commissioned, along with the
As
part of our work on the history of the women chainmakers
of Cradley Heath, the NUT commissioned a serious
study of the women involved and the events. Steve’s driving passion was the
alleviation of poverty. This subject touched him especially. The writer of the
history delved into a pre World War One Royal Commission into the Sweated
Trades, which described their conditions. It included an Inspector’s
observation that it was not unusual for a female chainmaker
to give birth and be back at work that very same evening. When I read this I
was livid and bounced into his office insisting that we do whatever we could to
bring such facts to the attention of the thousands of teachers who would be
taking children to visit the museum of the chainmakers’
strike at the BCLM. Steve was equally livid but was clear that it was the women
organizing into unions, which made the difference. Poverty did not solve
itself. Nor has it gone away. Nor will it until we meet it head on with
organization and action. This was his conclusion. The history is soon to be
published.
One
theme that intrigued Steve was that of union mergers. I would tease him by
saying of my craft, that where in 1900 there had been 91 print unions, by 2000
there was one. He would retort, “And by 2008 there was none!” referring to the
decision of the then GPMU to merge into Unite. But we both knew a single union
for all teachers was both doable and for Steve, essential. Unity is his legacy.
Only a single teacher union could effectively tackle child poverty.
Many
are now referring to a memorial for Steve and some have broached the question
of a monument. The only monument he would have accepted was the creation of a
unified, new union. It would be a force in education that could produce the
changes Steve dreamt of. It would be a modern, radical, campaigning union.
Steve’s understanding of living history, his instinct that workers are capable
of so much more and of the need for unity as a principle to be fought for are
the aspects of his legacy I have shared and will carry happily with me all my
days. With his passing, he has become a part of the working class history he so
forthrightly asserted.
Farewell friend. Thank you, teacher.